Chronic disease management creates a financial burden that extends far beyond medication costs. Telehealth consultations in Australia typically cost between $65 and $130 per appointment, and most practices require payment before the consultation begins. For patients managing conditions that require regular medical oversight, these recurring fees accumulate into an expense many struggle to sustain over months or years of treatment.
The fee structure becomes particularly problematic for follow-up appointments. A patient requiring monthly check-ins pays between $780 and $1,560 annually just for consultation access, before accounting for medication, testing, or specialist referrals. Healthcare on Collins charges $112 to $130 for standard consultations, leaving patients with out-of-pocket costs of $68.10 to $86.10 after Medicare rebates. These gaps add up quickly for anyone managing chronic conditions requiring consistent medical input.
Studies of Australian healthcare consumers show chronic illness creates disproportionate financial strain, with affected individuals dedicating larger shares of household income to medical expenses than healthy populations. The financial pressure compounds when illness affects employment capacity. Employment disruption due to illness compounds the financial challenge, forcing patients to cover escalating medical bills as their earning capacity declines.
The Compounding Effect of Consultation Fees
Traditional telehealth clinics operate on a fee-per-service model, charging patients for each interaction with a doctor. Private Medical charges $69 for standard 15-minute consultations, with longer appointments costing more. Doctors On Demand follows similar pricing structures, though most services cannot offer Medicare rebates because patients must have seen the practice in person within the previous 12 months.
The per-consultation model creates predictable revenue for clinics but unpredictable expenses for patients. Someone managing diabetes who needs quarterly appointments pays $276 to $520 annually just for basic check-ins at standard rates. Patients requiring more frequent monitoring face proportionally higher costs. Those needing longer consultations to discuss multiple issues or complex treatment adjustments pay $204 to $235 per visit at some clinics, translating to $816 to $940 annually for quarterly care.
Follow-up appointments carry the same fees as initial consultations at most telehealth services. Patients pay full consultation charges whether discussing test results, adjusting medication dosages, or reviewing treatment effectiveness. This pricing structure treats each medical interaction as a discrete transaction rather than part of ongoing care continuity. Prescription renewals often require separate consultations, adding another layer of recurring costs.
The fee-for-service model also discourages patients from seeking timely medical guidance between scheduled appointments. When each call to the doctor triggers a new $69 to $130 charge, patients hesitate to contact providers about medication side effects, treatment questions, or emerging symptoms that don’t seem urgent enough to justify the expense. This hesitation can lead to delayed interventions that ultimately require more intensive and costly treatment.
How No-Fee Models Change the Economics
Dispensed operates on a contrasting economic structure that eliminates per-consultation charges. The platform provides initial consultations at no cost and integrates ongoing appointments into a monthly subscription that includes both clinical support and medication. Patients pay a single monthly fee that covers all doctor appointments, prescription renewals, and treatment adjustments, without triggering additional consultation charges.
The subscription approach removes financial barriers to accessing medical guidance when needed. Patients can contact clinicians for medication reviews, treatment questions, or dosage adjustments without having to calculate whether each interaction warrants another consultation fee. Dispensed provides free monthly medical reviews where clinicians can tailor healthcare plans without generating new charges.
Reddit posts reveal how consultation fees influence healthcare decisions. One user noted that, when comparing costs across providers, the absence of fees beyond prescriptions made the service “one of the best ways” to access ongoing treatment, despite slightly higher medication prices. The analysis suggested that when initial consultation fees, follow-up consultation fees, and new prescription consultation fees are added at other providers, the price differential favors no-fee models.
The economic implications extend beyond simple cost comparison. Traditional clinics struggle to provide comprehensive chronic disease management, partly because Medicare rebates do not adequately compensate for the time required. A standard consultation generates around $42 in Medicare rebates, forcing clinics to charge gap fees to maintain viability. This creates a system in which practices must either limit consultation time or charge higher fees to sustain operations.
Long-Term Treatment Economics
The difference between fee-per-service and subscription models becomes more pronounced as treatment duration extends. A patient managing a chronic condition for five years through traditional telehealth, paying $90 per monthly consultation, spends $5,400 just on consultation access. Those requiring more frequent check-ins or longer appointment times face proportionally higher accumulated costs. These expenses exist separately from medication, testing, specialist referrals, and other treatment components.
Research examining Australian healthcare access shows that many people managing ongoing health conditions face difficult choices between medical care and essential living expenses. Financial constraints emerge as the primary obstacle to obtaining needed treatment, with those earning above welfare eligibility thresholds yet below comfortable healthcare affordability levels facing particularly acute pressure. The consultation fee structure directly influences these trade-offs.
Dispensed’s no-lock-in contract structure addresses another common concern with subscription models. Patients can cancel at any time without penalty, maintaining control over their healthcare decisions and financial commitments. This flexibility acknowledges that healthcare needs change and that financial circumstances fluctuate, allowing patients to adjust their care access to current needs rather than contractual obligations.
The subscription approach also changes how clinics allocate time and resources. Without needing to bill for each patient interaction separately, providers can offer seven-day live chat support and respond to patient questions without creating new charges. This removes the administrative burden of tracking billable consultations and enables more fluid patient-provider communication.
Questions remain about whether no-fee consultation models can scale sustainably across different patient populations and healthcare needs. The approach works well for conditions requiring consistent medication and regular monitoring, but may be less suitable for patients with highly variable care needs or those requiring frequent specialist referrals beyond the platform’s scope. The model depends on sufficient patient volume and consistent subscription revenue to support the clinical infrastructure and staff time required for comprehensive chronic disease management.
Healthcare financing in Australia remains built around episodic acute care despite chronic conditions now accounting for 87% of deaths. The consultation fee structure reflects this fundamental misalignment, charging patients per interaction rather than supporting continuous care relationships. Whether subscription models can successfully challenge this established framework while maintaining quality care and provider sustainability will determine their role in Australia’s healthcare future.
About the Author
